A projective line is a projective space of dimension 1.
If is a field, the projective line over is typically denoted . Set-theoretically it is a disjoint union where each has homogeneous coordinates and has homogeneous coordinates .
The classical case of a projective line is over the complex numbers , where is also known as the Riemann sphere. A meromorphic function on may be naturally interpreted as a holomorphic function .
In particular, a rational function may be interpreted as a holomorphic function ; concretely, if are relatively prime and of degrees respectively, then we may homogenize by setting and , and define by the mapping on homogeneous coordinates . In fact, there is a bijective correspondence between such holomorphic endomaps on and rational functions on (well, almost: the constant holomorphic map valued at corresponds to the illegitimate “rational function” ).
It is possible to define a synthetic/axiomatic notion of “projective line”, somewhat analogously to the synthetic definition of projective plane. It is less obvious how to do this, since there is no relation of “incidence” inside a projective line. One approach, due to (Buekenhout), is to axiomatize the collection of “central collineations” of a projective line.
In general, a central collineation of an -dimensional projective space (with ) is an automorphism of such that
If has dimension , so that it has nontrivial sub-projective-spaces of dimension , then the restriction of a central collineation of to any such sub-projective-space containing the center and not contained in the axis is again a central collineation. Conversely, every central collineation of any subspace of such a is induced from a central collineation of itself (see for instance Beutelspacher-Rosenbaum, Theorem 3.1.10). The latter fact uses Desargues’ theorem, but this is true since must be of dimension to have any nontrivial sub-projective-spaces.
Indeed, by a theorem of Baer (Beutelspacher-Rosenbaum, Theorem 3.1.8), whenever (of dimension ) is Desarguesian, a central collineation is uniquely determined by its axis, its center, and one more pair of corresponding points. Thus, given and , the central collineations with center and axis act freely and transitively on .
Of course, when is of dimension , before we can talk about central collineations, we need to already know what the “hyperplanes” are. However, in the hypothetical 1-dimensional case, hyperplanes are just points, so that the center and axis are both points, and we can imagine giving structure to by axiomatizing its central collineations instead of defining them. This is done by the following definition, due to Buekenhout (paper, book (chapter 6)).
(Buekenhout) A projective line is a set of cardinality together with the following.
A projective line is Desarguesian if in addition acts transitively on . In other words, if , there is a (necessarily unique) with .
We saw above that when is of dimension , then every central collineation of a subspace (of dimension ) is induced by some central collineation of . Even though this required Desargues’ theorem to prove, which might not be true in a projective plane (dimension ), we can still take the point of view that every “central collineation” of a line in a projective plane ought to be induced by a central collineation of the plane itself.
This yields the following construction: Given a projective plane (not necessarily Desarguesian), and a line in , for any define to be the set of permutations of that are the restriction to of some central collineation of with center and axis containing . It is straightforward to verify that this makes into a “projective line” in the above sense.
There are, however, plenty of projective lines not arising from projective planes. For instance, we might set for all .
Let be a division ring and a 2-dimensional right vector space over . Then has the structure of a Desarguesian projective line, where
Conversely, every Desarguesian projective line arises from a division ring in this way. Fix three points and define
It follows that every Desarguesian projective line can be embedded into a Desarguesian projective plane, and indeed a projective space of any dimension. See Buekenhout-Cohen, Chapter 6 for details.
Albrecht Beutelspacher and Ute Rosenbaum, Projective Geometry: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, 1998. (pdf)
Francis Buekenhout, Foundations of one Dimensional Projective Geometry based on Perspectivities. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, 43 (1975) 21-29. doi:10.1007/BF02995931
Francis Buekenhout and Arjeh M. Cohen, Diagram Geometry: Related to Classical Groups and Buildings. Springer, 2013, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34453-4 (author pdf)
Last revised on May 15, 2019 at 07:49:07. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.